03968nam a22004695i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020001800100024003500118050001300153050001400166072001600180072002300196072001500219100008200234245011600316250001800432264006900450300004300519336002600562337002600588338003600614347002400650490005100674505027300725520204300998650002903041650004003070650003203110650002303142650002903165650005203194650002303246710003403269773002603303776003603329776003603365830005103401856004603452978-3-031-44159-2DE-He21320251030110823.0cr nn 008mamaa231016s2024    sz |    s    |||| 0|eng d  a97830314415927 a10.1007/978-3-031-44159-22doi 4aQ334-342 4aTA347.A78 7aUYQ2bicssc 7aCOM0040002bisacsh 7aUYQ2thema1 aClocksin, William F.eauthor.4aut4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut10aComputational Modelling of Robot Personhood and Relationalityh[electronic resource] /cby William F. Clocksin.  a1st ed. 2024. 1aCham :bSpringer Nature Switzerland :bImprint: Springer,c2024.  aXI, 101 p. 12 illus.bonline resource.  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier  atext filebPDF2rda1 aSpringerBriefs in Computer Science,x2191-57760 aPart 1: Androids: Persons and Relationships -- Introduction -- Significant Concerns -- Personhood and Relationality -- Part 2: The Affinity System -- The Computational Model -- Modelling Concerns -- The Economy -- Narratives -- Analysis of Value Systems -- Conclusion.  aThis SpringerBrief is a computational study of significant concerns and their role in forming long-term relationships between intelligent entities. Significant concerns include attitudes, preferences, affinities, and values that are held to be highly valued and meaningful: The means through which a person may find deeply held identity, purpose, and transformation. Significant concerns always engage the emotions and senses in a way that simply holding an opinion may or may not. For example, experiencing a significant concern may provoke deep feelings of awe and wonder in a way that deciding what to have for lunch probably does not, even if the lunch decision involves a rich array of preferences and values. Significant concerns also include what Emmons has called ultimate concerns. The author builds upon this base by considering the hypothetical case of intelligence in androids. An android is defined as a human-like robot that humans would accept as equal to humans in how theyperform and behave in society. An android as defined in this book is not considered to be imitating a human, nor is its purpose to deceive humans into believing that it is a human. Instead, the appropriately programmed android self-identifies as a non-human with its own integrity as a person. Therefore, a computational understanding of personhood and how persons – whether human or android – participate in relationships is essential to this perspective on artificial intelligence. Computational Modelling of Robot Personhood and Relationality describes in technical detail an implementation of a computational model called Affinity that takes the form of a simulation of a population of entities that form, maintain, and break relationships with each other depending upon a rich range of values, motivations, attitudes, and beliefs. Future experimentation and improvements of this model may be used not only to gain a wider understanding of human persons but may also form a preliminary cognitive model of the reasoning process of an android. 0aArtificial intelligence. 0aUser interfaces (Computer systems). 0aHuman-computer interaction. 0aSocial psychology.14aArtificial Intelligence.24aUser Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction.24aSocial Psychology.2 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978303144158508iPrinted edition:z9783031441608 0aSpringerBriefs in Computer Science,x2191-577640uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44159-2