03165nam a22005175i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020003700100024003500137050001100172072001800183072002300201072001700224100008400241245013200325250001800457264007900475300006500554336002600619337002600645338003600671347002400707505036100731520098401092650002602076650003202102650003002134650003502164650003502199650002602234650003402260650003002294650002802324650003502352710003402387773002602421776003602447776003602483776003602519856004602555912001402601912001502615999001702630978-3-031-47739-3DE-He21320251030110900.0cr nn 008mamaa231227s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d a97830314773939978-3-031-47739-37 a10.1007/978-3-031-47739-32doi 4aB841.4 7aHPCF72bicssc 7aPHI0380002bisacsh 7aQDHR72thema1 aMcMahon, Peter.eauthor.4aut4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut96855810aStructuralism and Form in Literature and Biologyh[electronic resource] :bCritiquing Genetic Manipulation /cby Peter McMahon. a1st ed. 2024. 1aCham :bSpringer Nature Switzerland :bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,c2024. aXXI, 239 p. 22 illus., 11 illus. in color.bonline resource. atextbtxt2rdacontent acomputerbc2rdamedia aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier atext filebPDF2rda0 a1:Structuralism, Vitalism, and Bioengineering -- 2: The Debate: Cuvier and Geoffroy -- 3: Setting the Stage for Evolutionary Theory -- 4: Adaptationism and the Author -- 5: The Relational Turn -- 6: Prague Structuralism and the Poetic Function -- 7: Immanent Evolution -- 8: Phenotype then Gene -- 9: The Interpreting Organism -- 10: An Ecological Context. aThe book considers biology in parallel with philosophical structuralism in order to argue that notions of form in the organism are analogous to similar ideas in structuralist philosophy and literary theory. This analogy is then used to shed light on debates among biological scientists from the turn of the 19th century to the present day, including Cuvier, Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, Dawkins, Crick, Goodwin, Rosen and West-Eberhard. The book critiques the endorsement of genetic manipulation and bioengineering as keys to solving agricultural and environmental problems, suggesting that alternative models have been marginalized in the promotion of this discourse. Drawing from the work of philosophers including Cassirer, Saussure, Jakobson and Foucault the book ultimately argues that methods based on agroecology, supported by molecular applications (such as marker-assisted selection, MAS), can both advance agricultural development and remain focused on the whole organism. . 0aStructuralism.968559 0aSciencexPhilosophy.963307 0aPoststructuralism.962295 0aLiteraturexPhilosophy.966322 0aContinental Philosophy.96647614aStructuralism.96855924aPhilosophy of Science.96856024aPoststructuralism.96229524aLiterary Theory.96178724aContinental Philosophy.9664762 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978303147738608iPrinted edition:z978303147740908iPrinted edition:z978303147741640uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47739-3 aZDB-2-REP aZDB-2-SXPR c56904d56904