04199nam a22004935i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020003700100024003500137050001300172050001300185072001600198072002300214072001500237245013600252250001800388264006900406300004500475336002600520337002600546338003600572347002400608490009500632505111200727520124701839650002803086650002503114650002403139650006203163650002403225700009403249710003403343773002603377776003603403776003603439776003603475830010203511856004603613912001403659912001503673999001703688978-3-031-46727-1DE-He21320251030110905.0cr nn 008mamaa240101s2024    sz |    s    |||| 0|eng d  a97830314672719978-3-031-46727-17 a10.1007/978-3-031-46727-12doi 4aK201-487 4aK140-165 7aLAB2bicssc 7aLAW0000002bisacsh 7aLAB2thema10aDebating Lawsh[electronic resource] :bStudies on Parliamentary Justification of Legislation /cedited by A. Daniel Oliver-Lalana.  a1st ed. 2024. 1aCham :bSpringer Nature Switzerland :bImprint: Springer,c2024.  aXVII, 316 p. 13 illus.bonline resource.  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier  atext filebPDF2rda1 aLegisprudence Library, Studies on the Theory and Practice of Legislation,x2213-2856 ;v100 a1 Legislative Debates in Parliament as a Source of Statutory Justification. A Framework for Analysis and Evaluation -- 2 Was It Really ‘To No Avail’? The Legislative Deliberation on Underage Girls’ Access to Abortion in Spain -- 3 Legislative Debates on Death with Dignity and Euthanasia. An Approach to the Spanish Situation -- 4 Debating on the Rights of Crime Victims: A Legisprudential Examination of the Parliamentary Deliberation on the Spanish Victim Protection Act -- 5 Expelling, Discussing, and Throwing Values Out – The Parliamentary Debate on the Citizen Security Act and the ‘Push-backs’ at the Moroccan-Spanish Borders -- 6 Parliamentary Debate as a Source of Justification for the Combat against Gender Violence Act -- 7 Parliamentary Debates on Joint Custody Legislation -- 8 Parliamentary Debates on Bullfighting in Spain: Animals Lost in Translation? -- 9 Minimum Vital Income: A Legislative Debate from the ‘Participant-Observer’ Perspective -- 10 InterpretingFundamental Rights from the (Parliamentary) Bench. Notes on Constitutional Argumentation in Legislative Debates.  aThis book seeks to explore the potential and actual value of parliamentary debates as a source of legislative justification. Drawing on a sample of recent Spanish legislation, the papers collected here analyse (critically) the rationale of several laws or legislative measures as it can be reconstructed from the respective parliamentary discussions. All issues covered have given rise to intense political, legal and social controversy: they range from the combat against gender violence, the legal status of bullfighting, the protection of crime victims and the so-called ‘push-backs’ at the border, to the regulation of euthanasia, the minimum living income, underage girls’ access to abortion, and joint child custody. The volume is organised into two main parts. The first group of case studies adopt a legisprudential perspective and examine parliamentary deliberations in the light of the theory and methodology of legislative justification; the contributions in the second part follow approaches that fall outside – but are largely compatible with –legisprudence, and deal with aspects such as the rhetorical strategies employed by MPs when debating bills, and the role of elected legislators as constitutional interpreters. 0aLawxPhilosophy.967596 0aLawxHistory.967597 0aConstitutional law.14aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.96760024aConstitutional Law.1 aOliver-Lalana, A. Daniel.eeditor.4edt4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt9687932 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978303146726408iPrinted edition:z978303146728808iPrinted edition:z9783031467295 0aLegisprudence Library, Studies on the Theory and Practice of Legislation,x2213-2856 ;v1096879440uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46727-1  aZDB-2-LCR  aZDB-2-SXLC  c56974d56974