03199nam a22004455i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020001800100024003500118050001500153050000800168072001600176072002300192072001500215100007800230245008600308250001800394264007500412300004300487336002600530337002600556338003600582347002400618490007100642505073800713520093301451650002502384650001602409650002702425650001602452710003402468773002602502776003602528776003602564776003602600830007102636856004602707978-3-031-50799-1DE-He21320251030111419.0cr nn 008mamaa240207s2024    sz |    s    |||| 0|eng d  a97830315079917 a10.1007/978-3-031-50799-12doi 4aQ174-175.3 4aB67 7aPDA2bicssc 7aSCI0750002bisacsh 7aPDA2thema1 aWeintraub, Ruth.eauthor.4aut4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut10aHumean Bodies and their Consequencesh[electronic resource] /cby Ruth Weintraub.  a1st ed. 2024. 1aCham :bSpringer International Publishing :bImprint: Springer,c2024.  aXIV, 189 p. 1 illus.bonline resource.  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier  atext filebPDF2rda1 aJerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science,x2524-42560 aPart I: Interpretation -- Chapter 1. Interpreting Hume on Bodies -- Chapter 2. Arguments in Support of the Idealist Interpretation -- Chapter 3. Meeting Objections to the Idealist Interpretation -- Part II: Metaphysical Consequences of the Idealist Interpretation -- Chapter 4. Consequences of the Idealist Interpretation for the Unity of Space -- Chapter 5: Consequences of the Idealist Interpretation for Causation -- Part III: Consequences of the Idealist Interpretation for Hume’s Science of Man -- Chapter 6. Spatial and Causal Thoughts from an Idealist Point of View -- Part IV: Consequences of the Idealist Interpretation for Hume’s Methodology -- Chapter 7. The Idealist Interpretation Renders Hume More of an Empiricist.  aThis book defends the very contentious Idealist interpretation of Hume on external objects, and draws from it far-reaching metaphysical and epistemological consequences for Hume’s philosophy. Its interest is both interpretive and analytic. The content Hume ascribes to the belief in “bodies” is susceptible to more than one reading, and has not been systematically considered. Upholding the Idealistic interpretation is interesting in its own right, but also yields several important conclusions about the spatiality of objects, causation, Hume’s “science of man” and his epistemology. For instance, it argues that the Idealist reading means that there are no cross-temporal spatial relationships, and that the (more prevalent) Materialist reading takes Hume further away from methodological empiricism than does the Idealist counterpart, and may render his practice less in conformity with his official methodology. 0aSciencexPhilosophy. 0aPhilosophy.14aPhilosophy of Science.24aPhilosophy.2 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978303150798408iPrinted edition:z978303150800408iPrinted edition:z9783031508011 0aJerusalem Studies in Philosophy and History of Science,x2524-425640uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50799-1