03946nam a22004335i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020001800100024003500118050000800153072001600161072002300177072001600200100008000216245012400296250001800420264007900438300003300517336002600550337002600576338003600602347002400638505035800662520211601020650003503136650003303171650002303204650002603227650002303253650002203276710003403298773002603332776003603358776003603394776003603430856004603466978-3-031-54125-4DE-He21320251030111719.0cr nn 008mamaa240313s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d a97830315412547 a10.1007/978-3-031-54125-42doi 4aB65 7aHPS2bicssc 7aPHI0190002bisacsh 7aQDTS2thema1 aHilbrich, Sören.eauthor.4aut4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut10aOn Legitimacy in Global Governanceh[electronic resource] :bConcept, Criteria, and Application /cby Sören Hilbrich. a1st ed. 2024. 1aCham :bSpringer Nature Switzerland :bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,c2024. aXI, 222 p.bonline resource. atextbtxt2rdacontent acomputerbc2rdamedia aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier atext filebPDF2rda0 a1. Introduction -- Part 1: Legitimacy in Global Governance -- 2. Subject and Concept of Legitimacy -- 3. Legitimacy, Justice and Democracy -- 4. The All-Affected Principle -- 5. Towards a Standard of Legitimacy for Global Governance Institutions -- Part 2: The G20 -- 6. Nature and Functions of the G20 -- 7. The Legitimacy of the G20 -- 8. Conclusions. a“Sören Hilbrich’s work on legitimacy and global governance is original, illuminating and very thorough in its discussion of the question of the nature of legitimacy for international institutions. I am especially impressed with the in-depth discussion of the legitimacy of the G20.” —Thomas Christiano, University of Arizona “Sören Hilbrich develops a conception of legitimacy as the right to function, which is applicable to all political institutions. The implication of this conceptually rich discussion is that we should not be too ambitious in our legitimacy standards for Global Governance institutions. This study is a remarkable achievement and is a must for those interested in International Political Theory.” —Michael Zürn, WZB Berlin Social Science Center Global governance has a major impact on the lives of people around the world. However, traditional theories of legitimacy were usually developed for states and are not suitable for the diversity of global governance institutions that exist today. This book first develops a normative concept of legitimacy that is applicable to all political institutions. According to this concept, to regard an institution as legitimate means ascribing it the right to exercise its function in political practice. Secondly, the book discusses how the use of this concept opens up new perspectives in the debate on legitimacy criteria for global governance institutions. In this context, the book analyses the relationship of legitimacy to the values of justice and democracy and discusses the role of feasibility constraints and the all-affected principle in legitimacy judgements. The concept of legitimacy as the right to function opens up the conceptual space to accommodate the insight that legitimacy criteria are not the same for all global governance institutions, but depend on their function and context. Thirdly, the book applies the developed theoretical framework to a specific global governance institution, the G20. Sören Hilbrich is a researcher at the German Institute of Development and Sustainability in Bonn, Germany. 0aPolitical sciencexPhilosophy. 0aSocial sciencesxPhilosophy. 0aPolitical science.14aPolitical Philosophy.24aSocial Philosophy.24aPolitical Theory.2 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978303154124708iPrinted edition:z978303154126108iPrinted edition:z978303154127840uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54125-4