03036nam a22004935i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020001800100024003500118050001500153072001500168072001500183072002300198072001800221100008300239245014900322250001800471264007900489300004200568336002600610337002600636338003600662347002400698490004700722505053900769520074901308650003702057650003102094650002002125650003502145650002302180650002902203650002302232650002602255710003402281773002602315776003602341776003602377776003602413830004702449856004602496978-3-031-56894-7DE-He21320251030111753.0cr nn 008mamaa240329s2024    sz |    s    |||| 0|eng d  a97830315689477 a10.1007/978-3-031-56894-72doi 4aJN1-9692.2 7aJP2bicssc 7a1D2bicssc 7aPOL0580002bisacsh 7aJPx1D2thema1 aBellido, Francisco J.eauthor.4aut4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut10aConstitutional Debates, Rhetoric, and Political Philosophy in Spain’s Parliamentary Historyh[electronic resource] /cby Francisco J. Bellido.  a1st ed. 2024. 1aCham :bSpringer Nature Switzerland :bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,c2024.  aXI, 217 p. 1 illus.bonline resource.  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier  atext filebPDF2rda1 aRhetoric, Politics and Society,x2947-51550 aIntroduction: Examining Political Rhetoric in Spanish Constitutional Debates -- Chapter one: A Survey of Constitutional Debates in Spain’s Nineteenth Century -- Chapter two: The Historical Framework of Spain’s Twentieth-Century Constituent Moments -- Chapter three: Understanding Democracy in the Constituent Debates of 1931 and 1977–78 -- Chapter four: Competing Meanings of the New Democratic State -- Chapter five: Constitutional State Powers -- Chapter six: The Decentralization of Spain as a Political Nation -- Conclusion.  aThis book examines the conceptual contributions of constituent representatives in Spain during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The Spanish Parliament has been the stage for the political modernisation of the country. Constitutional debates have historically led to the gradual acknowledgement and broadening – usually unevenly – of citizens’ rights. At the same time, constitutional debates have created opportunities to design institutions and settle legal mechanisms to enforce rights and distribute state resources. The book identifies and analyses rhetorical and conceptual innovations produced in such debates from a historical perspective. Francisco J. Bellido is Postdoctoral Researcher at NOVA University Lisbon, Portugal. 0aEuropexPolitics and government. 0aCommunication in politics. 0aWorld politics. 0aPolitical sciencexPhilosophy.14aEuropean Politics.24aPolitical Communication.24aPolitical History.24aPolitical Philosophy.2 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978303156893008iPrinted edition:z978303156895408iPrinted edition:z9783031568961 0aRhetoric, Politics and Society,x2947-515540uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56894-7