04636nam a22005295i 4500 978-3-031-41737-5 DE-He213 20251030111754.0 cr nn 008mamaa 240330s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d 9783031417375 978-3-031-41737-5 10.1007/978-3-031-41737-5 doi JA85-85.2 JPH bicssc GTC bicssc POL000000 bisacsh JPH thema GTC thema Populism, Twitter and the European Public Sphere [electronic resource] : Social Media Communication in the EP Elections 2019 / edited by Juha Herkman, Emilia Palonen. 1st ed. 2024. Cham : Springer Nature Switzerland : Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, 2024. XLIV, 253 p. 15 illus. online resource. text txt rdacontent computer c rdamedia online resource cr rdacarrier text file PDF rda Chapter 1-Introduction: European Public Sphere, Populism and Twitter -- Chapter2- Data and Methodology in the Twitter EP2019 Analysis. -PART I Democratic Corporatist Countries. Chapter 3- The Netherlands: Populism from Margins to the Mainstream -- Chapter 4- Germany: Transnationalisation of Populist Radical Right -- Chapter 5- Finland: Populist Polarisation of Finnish Political Communication -- PART II Polarised Pluralist Countries. Chapter 6- Italy: Mixed Populism and Agenda-Setting in Election Campaign -- Chapter 7- Spain: Rising Right-Wing Populism -- PART III Liberal Countries. Chapter 8- Ireland: Emerging Right-Wing Populism -- Chapter 9- The UK: Brexit and Competing Populism -- Chapter 10- Comparison and Conclusions: What Twitter Campaigns Tell Us about Populism and Europeanisation of National Public Spheres?. This volume approaches the relationship between European public sphere and political communication in the framework of establishing populism and social media. The empirical analysis focuses on the comparison between different EU countries during the 2019 EP elections campaign. The data for the analysis was collected real time from Twitter in the Netherlands, Germany, Finland, Italy, Spain, Ireland and the UK. during a month period and are analyzed with both computerized quantitative and manual qualitative methods. The book introduces a new perspective in conceptualizing populism in comparative analysis, in which populism is understood rather as an antagonist logic of political identity formation than pre-defined political ideologies, movements or party cleavages. We approach implications of populist construction of ‘us’ and ‘not us’ in national contexts of 2019 EP election campaigns to find out the relationality between different political actors and parties. A special attention is paid to national/transnational and European/Eurosceptic tendencies in campaign rhetoric. By using a unique idea of ‘hashtag publics’ we approach the common Twitter discussions around the elections and ask: what particular topics and themes did different political actors distribute over Twitter during the 2019 EP elections, how were various topics and actors linked to each other, and how were campaign agendas and actors linked to populism? Juha Herkman is an Associate Professor of Media and Communication Studies at the University of Helsinki, Finland. Emilia Palonen works as a Senior University Lecturer in Political Science at the University of Helsinki. Chapter-No.1,Chapter-No.4 and Chapter-No. 8 are available open access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License via link.springer.com. Communication in politics. 65259 Social media. 36123 Political Communication. 67745 Social Media. 36123 Herkman, Juha. editor. edt http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 74368 Palonen, Emilia. editor. edt http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 74369 SpringerLink (Online service) Springer Nature eBook Printed edition: 9783031417368 Printed edition: 9783031417382 Printed edition: 9783031417399 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41737-5 ZDB-2-LCM ZDB-2-SXL 58803 58803