03412nam a22004335i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020001800100024003500118050001400153072001600167072002300183072001600206100007800222245011500300250001800415264007900433300003300512336002600545337002600571338003600597347002400633490006100657505042800718520145901146650002602605650002602631650001802657650002802675710003402703773002602737776003602763776003602799776003602835830006102871856004602932978-3-031-50411-2DE-He21320251030112021.0cr nn 008mamaa240430s2024    sz |    s    |||| 0|eng d  a97830315041127 a10.1007/978-3-031-50411-22doi 4aBD143-237 7aHPK2bicssc 7aPHI0040002bisacsh 7aQDTK2thema1 aWahlberg, Åke.eauthor.4aut4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut10aResolving Disagreementsh[electronic resource] :bA Semantic and Epistemological Inquiry /cby Åke Wahlberg.  a1st ed. 2024. 1aCham :bSpringer Nature Switzerland :bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,c2024.  aXI, 211 p.bonline resource.  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier  atext filebPDF2rda1 aPalgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion,x2634-61840 aChapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. The Epistemological Relevance of Disagreement -- Chapter 3. Disagreement and Meaning -- Chapter 4. Disagreement and Belief I: Puzzles About Disagreement -- Chapter 5. Disagreement and Belief II: Managing the Puzzles -- Chapter 6. Disagreement from the Radical Interpreter’s Point of View -- Chapter 7. Interpretation, Meaning, and Disagreement -- Chapter 8. Disagreement in Religion.  aThis book examines how the semantics and metaphysics of disagreement affect the epistemology of disagreement. It thus broadens the philosophical discourse by relating the epistemological discussion of (peer) disagreement to inquiries into the nature of disagreement and disagreeing. By doing this, it paints a new picture of the epistemological situation evoked by disagreement: To the same extent that an interpersonal dispute undermines the justification of the disputing persons’ beliefs, it also presents an obstacle to interpersonal understanding. This follows from the nature of meaning, belief and communication, rightly understood. In demonstrating the relevance of this to philosophical reflections on peer disagreement and resolution of disagreement, the book addresses arguably the most contentious kind of disagreement, namely, religious disagreement. It shows that apparent disagreement in religion suggests that the dialog partners might not have reached sufficient mutual understanding. This has important ramifications for the rationally right conduct in the face of religious disagreement, and for the possibility of rational resolution of religious disputes. Åke Wahlberg is a post-doctoral research fellow and lecturer in philosophy at Sankt Georgen Graduate School of Philosophy and Theology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. His main research interests are in the fields of philosophy of language, philosophy of religion and ethics. . 0aKnowledge, Theory of. 0aReligionxPhilosophy.14aEpistemology.24aPhilosophy of Religion.2 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978303150410508iPrinted edition:z978303150412908iPrinted edition:z9783031504136 0aPalgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion,x2634-618440uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50411-2