03573nam a22005175i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020003700100024003500137050001500172072001600187072002300203072001500226100009400241245016400335250001800499264006900517300003500586336002600621337002600647338003600673347002400709505032500733520136301058650002402421650002802445650002502473650003802498650002902536650003002565650002802595650002402623650006202647650008602709710003402795773002602829776003602855776003602891776003602927856004602963912001403009912001503023999001703038978-3-031-55795-8DE-He21320251030112022.0cr nn 008mamaa240430s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d a97830315579589978-3-031-55795-87 a10.1007/978-3-031-55795-82doi 4aK3400-3431 7aLND2bicssc 7aLAW0010002bisacsh 7aLND2thema1 aTavares da Silva, Suzana.eauthor.4aut4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut97612610aAdministrative Law for the 21st Centuryh[electronic resource] :bAdministrative Law on an Illiberal and Post-Democratic Context /cby Suzana Tavares da Silva. a1st ed. 2024. 1aCham :bSpringer Nature Switzerland :bImprint: Springer,c2024. aVIII, 102 p.bonline resource. atextbtxt2rdacontent acomputerbc2rdamedia aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier atext filebPDF2rda0 a1. The "idea" of administrative law -- 2.The theoretical and legal-institutional context -- 3. The "options" of administrative law -- 4.The "return" of "authoritative" administrative law -- The role of "concerted administrative law" -- 6. State responsibility,- 7. The control of administrative activity. 8. Conclusions. aThe book provides a discursive reflection on the current challenges facing administrative law, based on a key idea: the defence of the liberal model of society. The author describes the content of her book as a turning point on the traditional standards of the rule of law and the way it impacts on the administrative state and administrative law. Considering the current use (and abuse) of emergency law by governments – based on economic crisis, environmental crisis, pandemic, and the economic situation caused by the Ukraine war – she devises a different balance or equilibrium on the usual separation of powers. Many reasons contribute to this turning point: i) the weaknesses of an open society easily swayed by social networks; ii) social “tribalism” replaces common good and general interest; iii) social tribalism leads to illiberal society, which causes illiberal democracies; iv) illiberal democracies lead to ungovernability which reinforces the role of the government, the emergency law, and some de facto measures. The author looks at many recent decisions from the ECJ and the ECHR and some constitutional and administrative courts, which extends the interest of this work to a wide range of professionals, from scholars to students, from judges to lawyers, filling the gap from an administrative law perspective of the current issues. 0aAdministrative law. 0aLawxPhilosophy.967596 0aLawxHistory.967597 0aPrivate international law.965660 0aConflict of laws.965661 0aInternational law.958292 0aComparative law.96566214aAdministrative Law.24aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.96760024aPrivate International Law, International and Foreign Law, Comparative Law.9656672 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978303155794108iPrinted edition:z978303155796508iPrinted edition:z978303155797240uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55795-8 aZDB-2-LCR aZDB-2-SXLC c59548d59548