03751nam a22005295i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020003700100024003500137050001200172072001600184072002300200072001500223100008500238245015600323250001800479264007500497300003200572336002600604337002600630338003600656347002400692490006700716505043900783520140501222650003202627650003202659650003302691650002302724650001302747650003402760650003402794650002502828650003402853710003402887773002602921776003602947776003602983776003603019830007403055856004603129912001403175912001503189999001703204978-3-031-61555-9DE-He21320251030112335.0cr nn 008mamaa240627s2024    sz |    s    |||| 0|eng d  a97830316155599978-3-031-61555-97 a10.1007/978-3-031-61555-92doi 4aB1-5802 7aHPC2bicssc 7aPHI0090002bisacsh 7aQDH2thema1 aVagelli, Matteo.eauthor.4aut4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut97942510aReconsidering Historical Epistemologyh[electronic resource] :bFrench and Anglophone Styles in History and Philosophy of Science /cby Matteo Vagelli.  a1st ed. 2024. 1aCham :bSpringer International Publishing :bImprint: Springer,c2024.  aX, 218 p.bonline resource.  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier  atext filebPDF2rda1 aStudies in History and Philosophy of Science,x2215-1958 ;v610 a1. Introduction -- 2. Reassessing the “Historical Turn” in Philosophy of Science -- 3. Contemporary Historical Epistemologies -- 4. What (Good) is French Historical Epistemology? -- 5. Bachelard’s “Normative Turn” in Epistemology -- 6. Canguilhem’s Historiography Of The Life Sciences -- 7. Foucault’s Archaeological History -- 8. Hacking’s Styles of Scientific Reasoning -- 9. Styles of Science, Styles of Philosophy.  aThis book explores the key conceptual stakes underpinning historical epistemology. The strong Anglophone interest in historical epistemology, since at least the 1990s, is typically attributed to its simultaneously philosophical and historical synthetic approach to the study of science. Yet this account, considered by critics to be an unreflective assumption, has prevented historical epistemology from developing a clear understanding and definition, especially regarding how precisely historical and philosophical reflections on the sciences should be combined. Thus, this book uniquely analyses how the problems and tensions inherent to the “contemporary” phase of historical epistemology can be clarified by reference to the “classical” French phase. The archaeological method of Michel Foucault, which draws on and transforms fundamental insights by Gaston Bachelard and Georges Canguilhem, is used to exert an enduring influence on the field—especially through the work of Ian Hacking and his philosophical cum historical analyses of “styles of scientific reasoning”. Though this book is of great value to academic specialists and graduate students, the fact it addresses questions broad in scope ensures it is also relevant to a range of scholars in many disciplines and will provoke discussion among those interested in foundational issues in history and philosophy of science. 0aPhilosophyxHistory.970495 0aSciencexPhilosophy.963307 0aKnowledge, Theory of.959222 0aTechnology.958482 0aHistory.14aHistory of Philosophy.97049724aPhilosophy of Science.96856024aEpistemology.96978324aHistory of Technology.9661002 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978303161554208iPrinted edition:z978303161556608iPrinted edition:z9783031615573 0aStudies in History and Philosophy of Science,x2215-1958 ;v6197942640uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61555-9  aZDB-2-REP  aZDB-2-SXPR  c61073d61073