TY  - BOOK
AU  - Veshi,Denard
ED  - SpringerLink (Online service)
TI  - Refugees and the Law in Challenging Times – A Law and Economics Approach
SN  - 9783031611438
AV  - K3236-3268.5 
PY  - 2024///
CY  - Cham
PB  - Springer International Publishing, Imprint: Springer
KW  - Human rights
KW  - Law and economics
KW  - Law
KW  - Philosophy
KW  - History
KW  - International law
KW  - Emigration and immigration
KW  - Government policy
KW  - Human Rights
KW  - Law and Economics
KW  - Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History
KW  - Public International Law
KW  - Migration Policy
N1  - Chapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Refugee Rights during the Twentieth Century: A Historical Approach -- Chapter 3: The Geneva Convention of 1951: From a Human Rights Perspective to a Law and Economics Approach? -- Chapter 4: “Push” Factors upon Ratification and Compliance with the 1951 Convention -- Chapter 5: The different variables affecting the refugee’s "decision" process -- Chapter 6: The Pros and Cons of Centralizing Asylum Law in the EU -- Chapter 7: Conclusion
N2  - This book focuses on the economic analysis of refugee law and the protection of refugee rights. It offers a law and economics model applied to migration and states. The book focuses on the most critical ‘push’ factors that impact lawmakers in enacting and modifying asylum law. Furthermore, the book examines the economic advantages and disadvantages of a centralized supernational asylum law (acquis communautaire) that could, eventually, eliminate competition between legal orders in asylum law and do away with the negative externalities caused by ‘asylum shopping’. The book critically analyses international refugee law, pursuing an interdisciplinary approach. Its principal goal is to explore refugee law through the lenses of the law and economics approach and against the backdrop of a human rights approach. After explaining the evolution of the human rights approach, the book elaborates on the legal and economic factors that impact refugees, on the one hand, and public policy, on the other. In conclusion, a balance that considers the national preferences of destination countries and the protection of refugee rights is proposed
UR  - https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61143-8
ER  -