03926nam a22004575i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020001800100024003500118050001900153072001600172072002300188072001500211245019100226250001800417264008600435300004300521336002600564337002600590338003600616347002400652505057200676520163001248650002902878650003002907650002102937650002402958650002502982650002403007650002603031700007603057700007803133700007903211710003403290773002603324776003603350776003603386856004603422978-3-658-42915-7DE-He21320251030112635.0cr nn 008mamaa240717s2024    gw |    s    |||| 0|eng d  a97836584291577 a10.1007/978-3-658-42915-72doi 4aPN1992-1992.92 7aAPT2bicssc 7aPER0100002bisacsh 7aATJ2thema10aTelevision Studies and Research on Seriesh[electronic resource] :bTheory, history and present of (post-)televisual seriality /cedited by Denis Newiak, Dominik Maeder, Herbert Schwaab.  a1st ed. 2024. 1aWiesbaden :bSpringer Fachmedien Wiesbaden :bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,c2024.  aVI, 311 p. 20 illus.bonline resource.  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier  atext filebPDF2rda0 aContributions on: Television as a plural and transmedial concept? -- Spatialized transmediality - processual seriality -- Historical perspectives in the 'quality series' discourse of the television industry -- Television series against late modern loneliness: Forms of telemedial communion exemplified by 13 Reasons Why -- On expelling television from the television series: reality TV and staggered seriality -- Evidence in series? Time and reality references of serial television formats in the digital transformation -- Game in series - Black Mirror: Bandersnatch.  aTelevision series enjoy an unbroken – popular as well as scholarly – attention. It is surprising, however, that in works on seriality in media and cultural studies, approaches to television studies and television history still play a rather minor role. Yet seriality must always be thought of in terms of television, since the two have always been indissolubly interwoven – economically, technically, and aesthetically. But what else constitutes the serial in television and how does it change its face in times of digitalization, streaming and interactivity? Is it possible to think of a genuine serial theory of the televisual – and what, in turn, can be learned from this for seriality beyond television? The essays in this volume shed new light on the serial as a core principle of television, thus providing new impulses for a television theory of the serial on the basis of examples from the current range of television series. The Editors Dr. Denis Newiak is a research associate at the Chair of Applied Media Studies at the Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg. Dr. Dominik Maeder is an independent researcher. Dr. Herbert Schwaab is a senior academic councillor at the Institute for Information and Media, Language and Culture at the University of Regensburg. This book is a translation of an original German edition. The translation was done with the help of artificial intelligence (machine translation by the service DeepL. com). A subsequent human revision was done primarily in terms of content, so that the book will read stylistically differently from a conventional translation. . 0aTelevision broadcasting. 0aMotion picturesxHistory. 0aMotion pictures.14aTelevision Studies.24aFilm and TV History.24aGlobal Film and TV.24aAudio-Visual Culture.1 aNewiak, Denis.eeditor.4edt4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt1 aMaeder, Dominik.eeditor.4edt4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt1 aSchwaab, Herbert.eeditor.4edt4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt2 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978365842914008iPrinted edition:z978365842916440uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42915-7