05147nam a22004695i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020001800100024003500118050001300153050001300166072001600179072002300195072001500218245020600233250001800439264007500457300003200532336002600564337002600590338003600616347002400652490005000676505141900726520190902145650002104054650001804075650005504093650002304148700008104171700007804252700008304330710003404413773002604447776003604473776003604509776003604545830005004581856004604631978-3-031-61879-6DE-He21320251030112918.0cr nn 008mamaa240829s2024    sz |    s    |||| 0|eng d  a97830316187967 a10.1007/978-3-031-61879-62doi 4aK201-487 4aK140-165 7aLAB2bicssc 7aLAW0000002bisacsh 7aLAB2thema10aLaw, Morality and Judicial Reasoningh[electronic resource] :bEssays on W. J. Waluchow’s Jurisprudence and Constitutional Theory /cedited by Thomas Bustamante, Saulo de Matos, André L. S. Coelho.  a1st ed. 2024. 1aCham :bSpringer International Publishing :bImprint: Springer,c2024.  aX, 313 p.bonline resource.  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier  atext filebPDF2rda1 aLaw and Philosophy Library,x2215-0315 ;v1470 aIntroduction -- I. WALUCHOW’S JURISPRUDENCE RESTATED -- Incorporationism, Inclusivism, and Indeterminacy -- Inclusive Legal Positivism and the Fallibility of Officials -- Responses to Waluchow on Raz -- Waluchow on Institutional Forces of Law -- Some issues concerning Waluchow’s critique of Dworkin -- Competing Legal Positivisms, Methodology and Distinctive Visions of Law -- II. CONSTITUTIONAL REASONING, POLITICAL MORALITY AND JUDICIAL REVIEW -- Waluchow and Dworkin’s Disagreement on Legal Theory, Precedent and Adjudication: A Family Affair -- Lessons from Waluchow: Necessity, Determinacy, and Intelligibility of (Weak) Judicial Discretion -- Fixed and Non-fixed Meaning in Constitutional Interpretation: Waluchow’s Answer to Alice’s Paradox -- Waluchow’s Theory of Constitutional Interpretation from a Rhetorical-Argumentative Point of View -- Waluchow on Reasoning with the Morality of the Community -- III. CONSTITUTIONAL MORALITY APPLIED -- Reconciliation and the Living Tree Metaphor -- Global Justice, Indigenous Knowledge, and the Epistemic Merits of Institutionally Embodied Moral Intuitions -- The common law methodology in a barren soil: prospective judicial precedents and abstract judicial review -- Democracy and Adjudication in Latin America: A Critical Analysis of Wil Waluchow’s Common Law Theory of Judicial Review -- IV. INTERVIEW -- Interview with Professor Wil J. Waluchow.  aThis book provides a critical outlook on, and an inquiry into the practical implications of, the works of Professor W.J. Waluchow, one of the most important jurisprudence scholars of the early twenty-first century, while also reflecting on the interconnections between his legal theory and his theory of constitutional interpretation. It also features an interview with Waluchow, in which he responds to some of the chapters and shares a first-person perspective on his main philosophical ideas, how they emerged, and how they can be further developed and applied. The book makes a valuable contribution to contemporary legal philosophy by asking and providing different answers (from prominent legal philosophers and newer scholars in the field) to questions such as ‘How does Waluchow’s jurisprudence relate to his theories of legal reasoning and constitutional interpretation?’, ‘On what terms should we understand inclusive legal positivism?’, ‘Can inclusive legal positivism be reconciled with an interpretivist theory of adjudication?’, ‘How does it compare with Raz’s model of legal authority?’, ‘Can Waluchow’s notion of “community constitutional morality” be applied to contexts such as international law, pluralist legal communities, and indigenous laws?’, and ‘Is Waluchow’s methodology equipped to provide interpretive directives in unstable and extremely unequal legal systems?’. The chapters, all written by experts on jurisprudence (including some of the scholars who helped develop the tradition known as inclusive legal positivism), offer a unique analysis of Waluchow’s most complex and intriguing theses, providing not only a valuable exegetical analysis of his work but also a range of answers to the challenge of interpreting legal and constitutional values, as well as practical resolutions to persisting controversies in the philosophy of law. 0aLawxPhilosophy. 0aLawxHistory.14aTheories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History.24aPhilosophy of Law.1 aBustamante, Thomas.eeditor.4edt4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt1 ade Matos, Saulo.eeditor.4edt4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt1 aCoelho, André L. S.eeditor.4edt4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt2 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978303161878908iPrinted edition:z978303161880208iPrinted edition:z9783031618819 0aLaw and Philosophy Library,x2215-0315 ;v14740uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61879-6