03361nam a22005175i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020003700100024003500137050000900172050001300181072001600194072002300210072001500233100008100248245015900329250001800488264007200506300006400578336002600642337002600668338003600694347002400730505014300754520143000897650002102327650002302348650003002371650003002401650002602431650004102457650002902498650003002527650002602557710003402583773002602617776003602643776003602679776003602715856004602751912001402797912001502811999001702826978-981-97-4014-7DE-He21320251030113128.0cr nn 008mamaa241004s2024    si |    s    |||| 0|eng d  a97898197401479978-981-97-4014-77 a10.1007/978-981-97-4014-72doi 4aK588 4aK720-793 7aLNS2bicssc 7aLAW0740002bisacsh 7aLNS2thema1 aBabie, P. T.eauthor.4aut4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut98089910aShadow Property and the Hidden Empire of Egoh[electronic resource] :bReflections on the Past, Present, and Future of Liberal Property /cby P. T. Babie.  a1st ed. 2024. 1aSingapore :bSpringer Nature Singapore :bImprint: Springer,c2024.  aXV, 171 p. 19 illus., 14 illus. in color.bonline resource.  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier  atext filebPDF2rda0 aIntroduction Shadow Property and the Hidden Empire of Ego.-Law -- Private Property.-Ego -- Unjustifiable Law -- Reflections on Obligation.  aThis book explores the nature of liberal property in the twenty-first century. It contains three parts. The first examines how we have arrived at the liberal concept of property—what many scholars call the 'bundle of rights' metaphor of property. This part argues that the liberal conception embodied in the bundle of rights metaphor is really a way of masking or hiding what property really is: an exercise of ego about the way goods and resources are used. Or, put another way, it enshrines the ability to suit personal preferences about the way things are used, rather than what might better serve the common good. The second part provides an important modern critique of the bundle of rights metaphor—that, in addition to being a collection of rights, property is also about social relations that exist between people. Through these social relations, which are contained in law, any decision that a person makes about how to use a good or resource necessarily carries implications for others. While those effects can be both positive and negative, we are much more familiar with the latter, including most of the global challenges we face today—climate change, extreme weather, global hunger, and global poverty. Taking those global challenges as its focus, the final part of the book suggests possible futures of property in which it is reconceived in ways that reduce the potential for negative impacts on others. 0aProperty.983388 0aCommon law.975404 0aPolitical science.958714 0aEnvironmental Law.962029 0aGlobalization.95881814aCommon Property and Land Law.98339024aPolitical Theory.97060924aEnvironmental Law.96202924aGlobalization.9588182 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978981974013008iPrinted edition:z978981974015408iPrinted edition:z978981974016140uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4014-7  aZDB-2-LCR  aZDB-2-SXLC  c64008d64008