<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Statistical Significance and the PHC Curve</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Toyoda, Hideki.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm type="text">author.</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">aut</roleTerm>
    </role>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="code">http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="corporate">
    <namePart>SpringerLink (Online service)</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">si</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">2024</dateIssued>
    <edition>1st ed. 2024.</edition>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">electronic</form>
    <form authority="gmd">electronic resource</form>
    <reformattingQuality>access</reformattingQuality>
    <extent>XI, 156 p. 32 illus. online resource.</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>This book explains the importance of using the probability that the hypothesis is correct (PHC), an intuitive measure that anyone can understand, as an alternative to the p-value. In order to overcome the “reproducibility crisis” caused by the misuse of significance tests, this book provides a detailed explanation of the mechanism of p-hacking using significance tests, and concretely shows the merits of PHC as an alternative to p-values. In March 2019, two impactful papers on statistics were published. One paper, "Moving to a World Beyond ‘p &lt; 0.05’”, was featured in the scholarly journal The American Statistician, overseen by the American Statistical Association. The title of the first chapter is “Don't Say ‘Statistically Significant’”, and it uses the imperative form to clearly forbid the use of significance testing. Another paper, “Retire statistical significance”, was published in the prestigious scientific journal Nature. This commentary was endorsed by more than 800 scientists, advocating for the statement, “We agree, and call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned.” Consider a study comparing the duration of hospital stays between treatments A and B. Previously, research conclusions were typically stated as: “There was a statistically significant difference at the 5% level in the average duration of hospital stays.” This phrasing is quite abstract. Instead, we present the following conclusion as an example: (1) The average duration of hospital stays for Group A is at least half a day shorter than for Group B. (2) 71% of patients in Group A have shorter hospital stays than the average for Group B. (3) Group A has an average hospital stay that is, on average, no more than 94% of that of Group B. Then, the probability that the expression is correct is shown. That is the PHC curve.</abstract>
  <tableOfContents>Statistical Significance is Merely a Necessary Condition -- Academic Journals Filled with Redundant Papers -- Sample size must be determined in advance along with the evidence provided -- Does the Fact of Deciding in Advance Guarantee Permanence -- The Probability of a Research Hypothesis Being Correct.</tableOfContents>
  <note type="statement of responsibility">by Hideki Toyoda.</note>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Social sciences</topic>
    <topic>Statistical methods</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Statistics</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Markov processes</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Statistics </topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Mathematical statistics</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject authority="lcsh">
    <topic>Psychometrics</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Statistics in Social Sciences, Humanities, Law, Education, Behavorial Sciences, Public Policy</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Statistical Theory and Methods</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Markov Process</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Bayesian Inference</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Parametric Inference</topic>
  </subject>
  <subject>
    <topic>Psychometrics</topic>
  </subject>
  <classification authority="lcc">HA1-4737</classification>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Springer Nature eBook</title>
    </titleInfo>
  </relatedItem>
  <relatedItem type="otherFormat" displayLabel="Printed edition:"/>
  <relatedItem type="otherFormat" displayLabel="Printed edition:"/>
  <relatedItem type="otherFormat" displayLabel="Printed edition:"/>
  <identifier type="isbn">9789819777488</identifier>
  <identifier type="uri">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7748-8</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-7748-8</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">241028</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20251030113249.0</recordChangeDate>
    <recordIdentifier source="DE-He213">978-981-97-7748-8</recordIdentifier>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
