03304nam a22004575i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020001800100024003500118050001100153072001600164072002300180072001500203100008400218245014100302250001800443264006900461300006100530336002600591337002600617338003600643347002400679490004600703505029200749520131301041650002502354650001702379650001602396650002602412650002702438700008102465700007602546710003402622773002602656776003602682776003602718830004602754856004602800978-3-031-74169-2DE-He21320251030113303.0cr nn 008mamaa241108s2024    sz |    s    |||| 0|eng d  a97830317416927 a10.1007/978-3-031-74169-22doi 4aRA1148 7aJMK2bicssc 7aPSY0140002bisacsh 7aJMK2thema1 aBrown, Natalie Novick.eauthor.4aut4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut14aThe Parkland School Shooter:h[electronic resource] :bCulpability and FASD /cby Natalie Novick Brown, Stephen Greenspan, Karen Steele.  a1st ed. 2024. 1aCham :bSpringer Nature Switzerland :bImprint: Springer,c2024.  aXX, 92 p. 5 illus., 4 illus. in color.bonline resource.  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier  atext filebPDF2rda1 aSpringerBriefs in Criminology,x2192-85410 aChapter One—Evidence of FASD -- Chapter Two—How FASD affected the “adaptive functioning” of Nikolas Cruz -- Chapter Three--Why do experts routinely miss FASD and other brain-based disorders? -- Chapter Four—Why and when should FASD reduce criminal culpability and sentencing. .  aThis brief explores the justification of the death penalty, using the 2018 Marjorie Stoneman Douglas High School shooting in Parkland, Florida, as a case study. The authors argue that when an offender’s impairments severely impact their ability to make rational decisions, the death penalty is unjustified, regardless of the crime's severity. The book examines the case of Nikolas Cruz, the school shooter diagnosed with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD), including: The nature of FASD, how it was measured, and how it manifested in Cruz. The impact of FASD on Cruz’s adaptive functioning. The concept of “psychiatric overshadowing” and how it led to the oversight of Cruz’s FASD and associated brain damage by many mental health experts. The broader implications of FASD, with a recommendation to expand death penalty exemptions to include disorders equivalent to intellectual disabilities (ID). By focusing on the highly controversial Cruz case, the authors—key experts from the trial—offer insights into FASD and its often-overlooked role in determining criminal responsibility and sentencing. This book is essential for forensic psychologists, psychiatrists, mental health professionals, FASD/DD specialists, researchers, and legal professionals involved in death penalty defense work. 0aForensic psychology. 0aCorrections. 0aPunishment.14aForensic  Psychology.24aPrison and Punishment.1 aGreenspan, Stephen.eauthor.4aut4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut1 aSteele, Karen.eauthor.4aut4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut2 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978303174168508iPrinted edition:z9783031741708 0aSpringerBriefs in Criminology,x2192-854140uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74169-2