04106nam a22005175i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020003700100024003500137050001300172072001600185072002300201072001500224100008200239245010500321250001800426264007900444300006500523336002600588337002600614338003600640347002400676490007200700505040200772520183301174650003003007650003603037650002803073650002403101650002903125650004303154650002803197650002403225710003403249773002603283776003603309776003603345776003603381830007903417856004603496912001403542912001503556999001703571978-3-031-69929-0DE-He21320251030114553.0cr nn 008mamaa241130s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d a97830316992909978-3-031-69929-07 a10.1007/978-3-031-69929-02doi 4aJC11-607 7aJPA2bicssc 7aPOL0100002bisacsh 7aJPA2thema1 aKing, Joshua.eauthor.4aut4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut98827810aRousseau and the Limits of the Liberal International Orderh[electronic resource] /cby Joshua King. a1st ed. 2024. 1aCham :bSpringer Nature Switzerland :bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,c2024. aXXIII, 194 p. 5 illus., 3 illus. in color.bonline resource. atextbtxt2rdacontent acomputerbc2rdamedia aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier atext filebPDF2rda1 aThe Palgrave Macmillan History of International Thought,x2634-52260 aChapter 1: Introduction -- Chapter 2: Emile’s Invitation to Study International Politics -- Chapter 3: The Politics of Amour Propre: Constructing the International -- Chapter 4: The Foreign Policy of the Social Contract -- Chapter 5: The Tragedy of Small Power Politics: Rousseau’s Considerations on the Government of Poland -- CHAPTER 6: The Limits of International Cooperation -- Conclusion. aJean-Jacques Rousseau’s international thought anticipates many of the political dynamics that have arisen through globalization and great power competition. Rousseau and the Limits of the Liberal International Order considers Rousseau as a critic and a reformer of international politics, arguing that Rousseau’s account of liberty drives his approach to the international realm. Rousseau’s work provides an incisive critique. He dismantles notions of economic rationalism, rejects the preference for administration over self-governance, and encourages strategies of resistance as a meaningful response to great power rivalry. To address these concerns, Rousseau affirms an approach to international politics that is closely related to his account of political liberty. For Rousseau, liberty develops through one’s carefully chosen obligations that encourage self-rule, limit dependence on others, and constrain the irrational motives of politics. To pursue these goals, Rousseau proposes civic education and national institutions that cultivate a sense shared of humanity and limit the use of war. These alternatives moderate the desire for status and establish a form of national interest directed towards contentment and pluralism rather than competition. Rousseau acknowledges significant limits to these solutions. Citizenship creates substantive divisions among human beings, and the pursuit of national self-sufficiency may leave the state vulnerable to more powerful neighbors. Emphasizing these trade-offs draws attention to competing sources of human obligation and to the unsatisfying ways that international politics attempts to harmonize them. Joshua King is an Assistant Professor of American Politics and Deputy Director of the Graduate Scholarship Program, United States Military Academy West Point, USA. 0aPolitical science.958714 0aInternational relations.958103 0aCritical theory.958083 0aMaterialism.94039514aPolitical Theory.97060924aInternational Relations Theory.96830324aCritical Theory.95808324aMaterialism.9403952 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer Nature eBook08iPrinted edition:z978303169928308iPrinted edition:z978303169930608iPrinted edition:z9783031699313 0aThe Palgrave Macmillan History of International Thought,x2634-522698827940uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69929-0 aZDB-2-POS aZDB-2-SXPI c65334d65334