000 04077nam a22005055i 4500
001 978-3-031-51276-6
003 DE-He213
005 20251030111357.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 240119s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031512766
_9978-3-031-51276-6
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-51276-6
_2doi
050 4 _aK4240-4343
072 7 _aLNJ
_2bicssc
072 7 _aLAW000000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aLNJ
_2thema
100 1 _aDrazewski, Kasper.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_969675
245 1 0 _aCopyright as a Constraint on Creating Technological Value
_h[electronic resource] /
_cby Kasper Drazewski.
250 _a1st ed. 2024.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer International Publishing :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2024.
300 _aVII, 180 p. 2 illus., 1 illus. in color.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aLaw, Governance and Technology Series,
_x2352-1910 ;
_v63
505 0 _a1 introduction: legislating for the digital reality: a moving target -- 2. Welcoming digital innovation: why america seems to get it right -- 3. The mechanics of flexibility -- 4 Jewels in the sand: supporting creativity in a mass networked environment -- 5 EU (non) remedies to inflexible copyright: contracts as a policy tool -- 6 Courts of law v. Choke points for technological innovation -- 7 Conclusions.
520 _aCan we regulate something that doesn’t exist yet? Can Europe create its own Silicon Valley? Who gets to create technological value in today’s world? Whatever happened to the once-flourishing idea of rags to riches? Will new and exciting innovations only ever come from big tech companies? Can the EU establish its own flexible framework for boosting innovation, e.g. by facilitating the transformative use of technologies and data? This book seeks to answer these questions by exploring the differences in copyright culture in Europe and the United States, with its flexible fair use framework. The findings are anything but obvious, and decades of case law on both sides of the Atlantic tell a story of judges going to great lengths to deal with new challenges while navigating the imperfections of statutory law – both where it is too broadly formulated and where it is too prescriptive. How can the population’s creative potential best be fostered? What do software innovations havein common with the evolution of living organisms? What are the vulnerabilities of distributed creativity? Answers are sought in the processes that came into being during the early years of the digital revolution and were then forced to take a back seat as control of the means of production was increasingly placed in the hands of tech companies. The findings and insights presented here are highly relevant for today’s digital policymaking. Market concentration processes in innovation haven’t ceased; they are ongoing. And in an age where data-driven services are creating and reinforcing global oligopolies, the question posed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Google v. Oracle is now more relevant than ever: who should hold the keys to digital innovation?
650 0 _aInformation technology
_xLaw and legislation.
_967243
650 0 _aMass media
_xLaw and legislation.
_967244
650 1 4 _aIT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property.
_967246
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031512759
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031512773
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031512780
830 0 _aLaw, Governance and Technology Series,
_x2352-1910 ;
_v63
_969676
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51276-6
912 _aZDB-2-LCR
912 _aZDB-2-SXLC
999 _c57234
_d57234