000 03690nam a22005175i 4500
001 978-3-031-40504-4
003 DE-He213
005 20251030111433.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 240220s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031405044
_9978-3-031-40504-4
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-40504-4
_2doi
050 4 _aJZ2-6530
072 7 _aJPS
_2bicssc
072 7 _aPOL011000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aJPS
_2thema
100 1 _aCalarco, Roberto.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_971339
245 1 0 _aPolitical-Humanitarian Borderwork on the Southern European Border
_h[electronic resource] :
_bMainstream Humanitarian Organizations Within and Beyond the Hotspot System in Sicily /
_cby Roberto Calarco.
250 _a1st ed. 2024.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer International Publishing :
_bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,
_c2024.
300 _aXV, 189 p. 10 illus.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aMobility & Politics,
_x2731-3875
505 0 _aChapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. The Italian Border Management Policy Strategies.-Chapter 3. Humanitarianism, (De)politicization and Migration Control -- Chapter 4. The Implementation of the Hotspot Approach in Italy -- Chapter 5. Mainstream Humanitarian Organizations Politicizing the Increasingly Restrictive Border Management System -- Chapter 6. Mainstream Humanitarian Organizations Depoliticizing the Border Management System -- Chapter 7. Conclusion. .
520 _aThis book focuses on the role mainstream humanitarian organizations have in the functioning of the border management system on the southern European border (i.e. Italy). In particular, the author analyses the mainstream humanitarian organizations and NGOs (i.e. Red Cross, the UNHCR, Medici per I Diritti Umani – MEDU, Terre des Hommes and Oxfam) and their role within and beyond the implementation of the so-called ‘hotspot approach’ in Sicily. This work suggests that a vision of humanitarian action as just anti-political and complicit with migration control can be questioned. This book suggests that a) mainstream organizations have been able to politicize their positioning and actions vis-à-vis authorities when migration policies have been tightened; b) mainstream organizations’ political borderwork has helped to promote incremental change in the status quo rather than a radical one. Finally, this book suggests that the discourses and practices of mainstream and grassroots actors seems to be characterized by similar contradictions. Roberto Calarco is Doctor of Sociology at the Sorbonne Paris Nord University, France, and Doctor of Sociology and Methodology of Social Research at the University of Milan, Italy.
650 0 _aInternational relations.
_958103
650 0 _aEmigration and immigration.
_958113
650 1 4 _aInternational Relations.
_958103
650 2 4 _aHuman Migration.
_967323
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031405037
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031405051
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031405068
830 0 _aMobility & Politics,
_x2731-3875
_970907
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40504-4
912 _aZDB-2-POS
912 _aZDB-2-SXPI
999 _c57729
_d57729