000 03759nam a22005175i 4500
001 978-3-031-50411-2
003 DE-He213
005 20251030112021.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 240430s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031504112
_9978-3-031-50411-2
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-50411-2
_2doi
050 4 _aBD143-237
072 7 _aHPK
_2bicssc
072 7 _aPHI004000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aQDTK
_2thema
100 1 _aWahlberg, Åke.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_976102
245 1 0 _aResolving Disagreements
_h[electronic resource] :
_bA Semantic and Epistemological Inquiry /
_cby Åke Wahlberg.
250 _a1st ed. 2024.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer Nature Switzerland :
_bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,
_c2024.
300 _aXI, 211 p.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aPalgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion,
_x2634-6184
505 0 _aChapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. The Epistemological Relevance of Disagreement -- Chapter 3. Disagreement and Meaning -- Chapter 4. Disagreement and Belief I: Puzzles About Disagreement -- Chapter 5. Disagreement and Belief II: Managing the Puzzles -- Chapter 6. Disagreement from the Radical Interpreter’s Point of View -- Chapter 7. Interpretation, Meaning, and Disagreement -- Chapter 8. Disagreement in Religion.
520 _aThis book examines how the semantics and metaphysics of disagreement affect the epistemology of disagreement. It thus broadens the philosophical discourse by relating the epistemological discussion of (peer) disagreement to inquiries into the nature of disagreement and disagreeing. By doing this, it paints a new picture of the epistemological situation evoked by disagreement: To the same extent that an interpersonal dispute undermines the justification of the disputing persons’ beliefs, it also presents an obstacle to interpersonal understanding. This follows from the nature of meaning, belief and communication, rightly understood. In demonstrating the relevance of this to philosophical reflections on peer disagreement and resolution of disagreement, the book addresses arguably the most contentious kind of disagreement, namely, religious disagreement. It shows that apparent disagreement in religion suggests that the dialog partners might not have reached sufficient mutual understanding. This has important ramifications for the rationally right conduct in the face of religious disagreement, and for the possibility of rational resolution of religious disputes. Åke Wahlberg is a post-doctoral research fellow and lecturer in philosophy at Sankt Georgen Graduate School of Philosophy and Theology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. His main research interests are in the fields of philosophy of language, philosophy of religion and ethics. .
650 0 _aKnowledge, Theory of.
_959222
650 0 _aReligion
_xPhilosophy.
_968553
650 1 4 _aEpistemology.
_969783
650 2 4 _aPhilosophy of Religion.
_968554
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031504105
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031504129
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031504136
830 0 _aPalgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion,
_x2634-6184
_976103
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50411-2
912 _aZDB-2-REP
912 _aZDB-2-SXPR
999 _c59537
_d59537