000 04395nam a22005535i 4500
001 978-3-031-53666-3
003 DE-He213
005 20251030112033.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 240509s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031536663
_9978-3-031-53666-3
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-53666-3
_2doi
050 4 _aB1-5802
072 7 _aHPC
_2bicssc
072 7 _aPHI009000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aQDH
_2thema
245 1 0 _aGrounding in Medieval Philosophy
_h[electronic resource] /
_cedited by Calvin G. Normore, Stephan Schmid.
250 _a1st ed. 2024.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer Nature Switzerland :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2024.
300 _aIX, 333 p. 2 illus.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aHistorical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action,
_x2509-4807 ;
_v14
505 0 _a1. Introduction: Grounding Then and Now (Magali Roques) -- 2. Ontological Priority and Grounding in Aristotle’s Categories (Riin Sirkel) -- 3. Grounding and Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics (Petter Sandstad) -- 4. Ground in Avicenna’s Logic (Paul Thom) -- 5. Abelard on Grounding in Ontology and Logic (Christopher J. Martin) -- 6. Grounding Medieval Consequence (Jacob W. Archambault) -- 7. Does a Stone Make Itself Heavy? A Thirteenth-Century Problem about the Causation of Proper and Inseparable Accidents (Simona Vucu) -- 8. Ockham on Priority and Posteriority (JT Paasch) -- 9. William of Ockham on Essential Dependence and Causation (Magali Roques) -- 10. The Incoherence of Ockham’s Ethics (Thomas M. Ward) -- 11. Up in the Air: Buridan’s Principled Rejection of Grounding (Calvin G. Normore) -- 12. Valid on Formal Grounds (Mikko Yrjönsuuri) -- 13. Two Kinds of Grounding? Suárez on Natural Resultance and Foundation (Stephan Schmid) -- 14. Some Work for a Theory of Grounding? (Ricki Bliss).
520 _aThis book offers a selection of 13 case studies on how the notion of grounding helps illuminate philosophical discussions of our past with a special focus on debates of the Middle Ages. It thereby makes not only the case that the notion of grounding, which has become so widely debated in analytic metaphysics, has a long and venerable tradition, but also shows that this tradition has a lot to teach to contemporary philosophers of grounding. This is because the historical authors discussed in this volume – that is, Aristotle, Fazang, Boethius, Avicenna, Abelard, Aquinas, Scotus, Ockham, Buridan, Suárez, Leibniz, and others – suggested different types of non-efficient-causal explanations which are to be carefully distinguished. This volume illustrates how philosophy and history of philosophy can be mutually illuminating by showing that the terminology developed in the contemporary debate about grounding can help reconstruct philosophical discussions from Antiquity up to the Early Modern Period, and that these very discussions enrich, and in part challenge the contemporary debate about grounding. In this vein, it is an important reading for everyone interested in the history of grounding and the philosophical insights that this history might have left to us.
650 0 _aPhilosophy
_xHistory.
_970495
650 0 _aPhilosophy, Medieval.
_966933
650 0 _aPhilosophy, Modern.
_966190
650 1 4 _aHistory of Philosophy.
_970497
650 2 4 _aMedieval Philosophy.
_966938
650 2 4 _aEarly Modern Philosophy.
_974393
700 1 _aNormore, Calvin G.
_eeditor.
_4edt
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
_976559
700 1 _aSchmid, Stephan.
_eeditor.
_4edt
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt
_976560
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031536656
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031536670
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031536687
830 0 _aHistorical-Analytical Studies on Nature, Mind and Action,
_x2509-4807 ;
_v14
_974699
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53666-3
912 _aZDB-2-REP
912 _aZDB-2-SXPR
999 _c59731
_d59731