000 03958nam a22005775i 4500
001 978-3-031-61555-9
003 DE-He213
005 20251030112335.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 240627s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031615559
_9978-3-031-61555-9
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-61555-9
_2doi
050 4 _aB1-5802
072 7 _aHPC
_2bicssc
072 7 _aPHI009000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aQDH
_2thema
100 1 _aVagelli, Matteo.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_979425
245 1 0 _aReconsidering Historical Epistemology
_h[electronic resource] :
_bFrench and Anglophone Styles in History and Philosophy of Science /
_cby Matteo Vagelli.
250 _a1st ed. 2024.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer International Publishing :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2024.
300 _aX, 218 p.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aStudies in History and Philosophy of Science,
_x2215-1958 ;
_v61
505 0 _a1. Introduction -- 2. Reassessing the “Historical Turn” in Philosophy of Science -- 3. Contemporary Historical Epistemologies -- 4. What (Good) is French Historical Epistemology? -- 5. Bachelard’s “Normative Turn” in Epistemology -- 6. Canguilhem’s Historiography Of The Life Sciences -- 7. Foucault’s Archaeological History -- 8. Hacking’s Styles of Scientific Reasoning -- 9. Styles of Science, Styles of Philosophy.
520 _aThis book explores the key conceptual stakes underpinning historical epistemology. The strong Anglophone interest in historical epistemology, since at least the 1990s, is typically attributed to its simultaneously philosophical and historical synthetic approach to the study of science. Yet this account, considered by critics to be an unreflective assumption, has prevented historical epistemology from developing a clear understanding and definition, especially regarding how precisely historical and philosophical reflections on the sciences should be combined. Thus, this book uniquely analyses how the problems and tensions inherent to the “contemporary” phase of historical epistemology can be clarified by reference to the “classical” French phase. The archaeological method of Michel Foucault, which draws on and transforms fundamental insights by Gaston Bachelard and Georges Canguilhem, is used to exert an enduring influence on the field—especially through the work of Ian Hacking and his philosophical cum historical analyses of “styles of scientific reasoning”. Though this book is of great value to academic specialists and graduate students, the fact it addresses questions broad in scope ensures it is also relevant to a range of scholars in many disciplines and will provoke discussion among those interested in foundational issues in history and philosophy of science.
650 0 _aPhilosophy
_xHistory.
_970495
650 0 _aScience
_xPhilosophy.
_963307
650 0 _aKnowledge, Theory of.
_959222
650 0 _aTechnology.
_958482
650 0 _aHistory.
650 1 4 _aHistory of Philosophy.
_970497
650 2 4 _aPhilosophy of Science.
_968560
650 2 4 _aEpistemology.
_969783
650 2 4 _aHistory of Technology.
_966100
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031615542
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031615566
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031615573
830 0 _aStudies in History and Philosophy of Science,
_x2215-1958 ;
_v61
_979426
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61555-9
912 _aZDB-2-REP
912 _aZDB-2-SXPR
999 _c61073
_d61073