000 03506nam a22005175i 4500
001 978-3-031-64557-0
003 DE-He213
005 20251030112638.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 240719s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031645570
_9978-3-031-64557-0
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-64557-0
_2doi
050 4 _aB829.5.A-Z
072 7 _aHPCF3
_2bicssc
072 7 _aPHI018000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aQDHR5
_2thema
100 1 _aKoloskov, Daniil.
_eauthor.
_0(orcid)0009-0002-1856-3832
_1https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1856-3832
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_980891
245 1 0 _aLife without a Ground: A Praxis of Being-in-the-World
_h[electronic resource] /
_cby Daniil Koloskov.
250 _a1st ed. 2024.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer Nature Switzerland :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2024.
300 _aXXI, 194 p.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aContributions to Phenomenology, In Cooperation with The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology,
_x2215-1915 ;
_v132
505 0 _aIntroduction: The Primacy of Practice as a “Radical Reflection” -- 1 Ontological Gap in the Neo-Pragmatism -- 2 Pragmatism of Existential Ontology -- 3 Phenomenology and the Primacy of Practice Thesis (II): Existential Phenomenological Pragmatism -- 4 Cognitive Disclosure and the Meaning of Truth -- 5 Cultural Lichtung.
520 _aThis book argues for the pragmatist thesis of the primacy of praxis on a phenomenological basis. Demonstrating the relevance of phenomenology, it provides a systematic overview of the contemporary pragmatic landscape, taking into account not only a family of neo-pragmatic approaches but also the current pragmatic readings of phenomenology. This volume offers an innovative formulation of the primacy of practice thesis based on the genetic reformulation of Heidegger’s notions of disclosure, Dasein, and average intelligibility (Das Man). Investigating the dynamic interrelation among those notions, the author arrives at the phenomenological conception of forms of life or average background practices and argues that a form of life is not a pragmatic condition of meaningfulness but an outcome of the dynamic process of meaning-formation. This text concludes that the formation of meaning has no overarching origin but sources from the bundle of disparate practical spaces, and is ‘anarchic’ in nature. It appeals to students and researchers working in phenomenology and philosophical anthropology.
650 0 _aPhenomenology .
_962362
650 0 _aPhilosophical anthropology.
_977368
650 1 4 _aPhenomenology.
_962362
650 2 4 _aPhilosophical Anthropology.
_977368
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031645563
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031645587
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031645594
830 0 _aContributions to Phenomenology, In Cooperation with The Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology,
_x2215-1915 ;
_v132
_968144
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-64557-0
912 _aZDB-2-REP
912 _aZDB-2-SXPR
999 _c61739
_d61739