000 03568nam a22005175i 4500
001 978-3-031-48158-1
003 DE-He213
005 20251030112656.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 240729s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031481581
_9978-3-031-48158-1
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-48158-1
_2doi
050 4 _aQ124.6-127.2
072 7 _aPDX
_2bicssc
072 7 _aSCI034000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aPDX
_2thema
100 1 _aHøyrup, Jens.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_973952
245 1 0 _aExplorations and False Trails
_h[electronic resource] :
_bThe Innovative Techniques That Brought About Modern Algebra /
_cby Jens Høyrup.
250 _a1st ed. 2024.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer Nature Switzerland :
_bImprint: Springer,
_c2024.
300 _aX, 143 p. 15 illus.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
490 1 _aSpringerBriefs in History of Science and Technology,
_x2211-4572
505 0 _aPreface -- Introduction -- Chapter 1. Geometric proofs -- Chapter 2. Powers of the unknown -- Chapter 3. Abbreviations, glyphs, symbols and symbolic calculation -- Chapter 4. Embedding and parenthesis function -- Chapter 5. Several unknowns -- Chapter 6. The transition to incipient modern algebra -- Bibliography -- Index. .
520 _aThis book provides a unique perspective on the history of European algebra up to the advent of Viète and Descartes. The standard version of this history is written on the basis of a narrow and misleading source basis: the Latin translations of al-Khwārizmī, Fibonacci's Liber abbaci, Luca Pacioli's Summa, Cardano's Ars magna—with neither Fibonacci nor Pacioli being read in detail. The existence of the Italian abacus and German cossic algebra is at most taken note of but they are not read, leading to the idea that Viète's and Descartes' use of genuine symbolism (not only abbreviations), many unknowns, and abstract coefficients seem to be miraculous leaps. This book traces the meandering development of all these techniques along with the mostly ignored but very important parenthesis function, by means of detailed readings of all pertinent sources, including the abacus and cossic algebra and French algebra from Chuquet to Gosselin. It argues for a necessary distinction between abbreviating glyphs and genuine symbols serving within a symbolic syntax, which allows it to trace the emergence of symbolic calculation. Characterization of the mathematical practice of the environment within which Viète and Descartes moved allows for an explanation of how these two figures did not even need to invent abstract coefficients but rather received them as a gift.
650 0 _aScience
_xHistory.
_965232
650 0 _aMathematics.
_965523
650 0 _aHistory.
650 1 4 _aHistory of Science.
_966101
650 2 4 _aHistory of Mathematical Sciences.
_966197
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031481574
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031481598
830 0 _aSpringerBriefs in History of Science and Technology,
_x2211-4572
_980976
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48158-1
912 _aZDB-2-HTY
912 _aZDB-2-SXH
999 _c62006
_d62006