000 04145nam a22005055i 4500
001 978-3-031-74414-3
003 DE-He213
005 20251030113245.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 241025s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031744143
_9978-3-031-74414-3
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-74414-3
_2doi
050 4 _aB108-708
072 7 _aHPCA
_2bicssc
072 7 _aPHI002000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aQDHA
_2thema
100 1 _aStella, Aldo.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_986591
245 1 4 _aThe Principle as Ground, Non-Contradiction and Aristotle
_h[electronic resource] /
_cby Aldo Stella, Giancarlo Ianulardo.
250 _a1st ed. 2024.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer Nature Switzerland :
_bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,
_c2024.
300 _aVI, 95 p.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
505 0 _a1 Introduction -- 2 The formal elenchos appearing in the Principle of Non-Contradiction -- 3 The proof of the Protrepticus as an overcoming of formal elenchus -- 4 Some theoretical implications of the argument -- 5 Conclusion.
520 _a“We have the thesis, as radical as it is suggestive, of a syntactic-formal reduction of the principle of non-contradiction (Metaphysics IV), which must transcend itself into the principle of demonstration (Protrepticus). Read through the Aristotelian texts, the irreducibility of the principle of intelligibility to its determination will question and challenge both the theoretician and the historian of philosophy.” —Carlo Scilironi, Professor of Theoretical Philosophy, University of Padua, Italy. “The work shows that the authentic principle-ground can neither be determined nor obtained as the result of a proof, not even of the elenchus type, as in Aristotle's Metaphysics, but is that by virtue of which any proof is possible, as in Aristotle's Protrepticus, where it is shown that the necessity of philosophising is the ground even of its attempted negation. It will prove an essential reading for specialists in metaphysics.” —Ricardo Crespo, Professor of Philosophy of Economics, Austral University, Argentina. Numerous thinkers have considered the Principle of Non-Contradiction, but none has clearly identified its inherent limitation: that it is itself only a formal principle. This book shows that negation plays a fundamental role both in the constitution of the principle and in the affirmation of its value, which consists in its undeniability. Since it is a formal negation, it is extrinsic to the negated in such a way that it is configured as a negation only insofar as it is applied to something. On the basis of this analysis, it is shown that it is possible to reverse the usual philosophical perspective: it makes no sense to speak of proof of the principle, but only of proof by virtue of the principle. This book is essential reading for all scholars and researchers of theoretical philosophy and Aristotle. Aldo Stella, former Professor of Philosophy at the University of Urbino, is Professor of Psychology at the University of Perugia, Italy. Giancarlo Ianulardo is Senior Lecturer in Economics at the University of Exeter, UK.
650 0 _aPhilosophy, Ancient.
_972850
650 0 _aMetaphysics.
_970839
650 1 4 _aAncient Philosophy / Classical Philosophy.
_972851
650 2 4 _aMetaphysics.
_970839
700 1 _aIanulardo, Giancarlo.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_986592
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031744136
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031744150
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031744167
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74414-3
912 _aZDB-2-REP
912 _aZDB-2-SXPR
999 _c64485
_d64485