000 04110nam a22005415i 4500
001 978-3-031-75573-6
003 DE-He213
005 20251030114553.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 241130s2024 sz | s |||| 0|eng d
020 _a9783031755736
_9978-3-031-75573-6
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-031-75573-6
_2doi
050 4 _aJA85-85.2
072 7 _aJPH
_2bicssc
072 7 _aGTC
_2bicssc
072 7 _aPOL000000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aJPH
_2thema
072 7 _aGTC
_2thema
100 1 _aKekki, Minna-Kerttu.
_eauthor.
_4aut
_4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut
_988294
245 1 4 _aThe Potential of Public Discussion in Media
_h[electronic resource] :
_bPhilosophy of Democracy and Misinformation /
_cby Minna-Kerttu Kekki.
250 _a1st ed. 2024.
264 1 _aCham :
_bSpringer Nature Switzerland :
_bImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,
_c2024.
300 _aXI, 244 p.
_bonline resource.
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
505 0 _a1 Introduction: Why investigate the potential of public discussions in media -- PART I Public discussion in media in the 21st century -- 2 The concept of public discussions in media -- 3 The digital media blurring the borders of public discussion -- 4 Public discussion in media as a democratic space characterized by plurality -- PART II The first-person perspective: Others appearing in public discussions in media -- 5 The experience of public discussions in media as a political-phenomenological research object -- 6 The media object appearing as others -- 7 The homeworld and the alienworld: Strangers in the same public media sphere -- 8 Historicity of affective experience: Contents catching our attention and influencing us PART III Public discussions in media as a potential for learning and dialogue -- 9 Learning through media-based public discussions: Experience versus reality -- 10 Public discussion in media as a complex of risks and possibilities -- 11 Dialogue instead of facts: Let the truth be -- 12 Conclusion: What this means for democracy.
520 _aA friend recommended an interesting news article to you that changed your view on the topic. Later, you find out that the information in the article was false. Did you learn something, even though the information was not correct? From the subjective perspective at that moment, the answer is “yes,” but from the objective perspective, you were led false. “The Potential of Public Discussion in Media: Philosophy of Democracy and Misinformation,” takes up two perspectives on public discussions in media: the outsider’s third-person perspective and the first-person perspective of the engaged subject. By investigating public discussion in media through both perspectives, public discussion appears simultaneously both crucial and risky for democracy. The book uses phenomenology to frame the problematic of contemporary public discussions in media, which emphasizes the subjective experience of gaining new information. Minna-Kerttu Kekki is a researcher at the University of Helsinki Center of Excellence in European Studies. She has had previous appointments at the University of Oulu (Finland) and the University of Sussex (UK). .
650 0 _aCommunication in politics.
_965259
650 0 _aCommunication.
_959615
650 0 _aInformation theory.
_957783
650 1 4 _aPolitical Communication.
_967745
650 2 4 _aMedia and Communication Theory.
_971787
650 2 4 _aMedia and Communication.
710 2 _aSpringerLink (Online service)
773 0 _tSpringer Nature eBook
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031755729
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031755743
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783031755750
856 4 0 _uhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75573-6
912 _aZDB-2-SLS
912 _aZDB-2-SXS
999 _c65343
_d65343